Jimmy Carter Election
Campaign
Andrew Tarbox, Green Block
After Richard Nixon resigned from office in 1974 to avoid
impeachment after the infamous Watergate Scandal, an event that both destroyed
his political career and created distrust of the American people with the
national government, Vice President Gerald Ford became President. In a risky
speech on September 8, 1974, only about a month after Nixon’s resignation, Ford
pardoned Nixon’s actions by saying, “It is common knowledge that serious
allegations and accusations hang like a sword over our former President’s
head…as he tries to reshape his life, a great part of which was spent in the
service of this country and by the mandate of its people.” Before Ford pardoned
Nixon’s actions, his approval rating was 71%; however, not long after pardoning
Nixon’s actions, his approval rating plummeted to 46%, resulting in a poor
rapport with the American people leading into the 1976 election.
As a result, voters looked to a candidate who they could
trust. Jimmy Carter, a member of a long family line of peanut farmers and the
former governor of Georgia ,
insisted that he was just that candidate and portrayed himself as “a leader for
a change.” In addition to portraying himself as a candidate who would provide
change, his most important campaign strategy was his emphasis on integrity,
honesty, and cooperation with the American people. For example, in a 1976 television
advertisement, Carter said, “ we've seen walls built around Washington and we feel like we can’t quite
get through to guarantee the people of this country a government that’s
sensitive to our needs.” Furthermore, in speeches that Carter gave in New Hampshire , Mississippi ,
and Iowa he
finished them with the same message of having a government that cooperatively
works with the people and stated such promises in vague terms. For example he
said, “I don’t want anything selfish out of the government. And I think I want
the same thing you do. And that is to have our nation once again with a
government as good and honest and decent and truthful and fair and competent
and idealistic and compassionate, and as filled with love, as are the American
people.”
Jimmy Carter’s campaign theme of always being on the side of
the American people whether it was promising to be sensitive to their needs or
being truthful to them, as well as his speaking in vague terms proves aspects
of Cicero ’s
campaign tips for his brother, Marcus, a candidate for consul in 64 BC. In
writing to his brother about what will result in his election, Cicero told his
brother, “There are three things that will guarantee votes in an election:
favors, hope, and personal attachment…As for those who you have inspired with
hope…you must make them believe that you will always be there to help them.” By
entering the election during a period of national scandal, Jimmy Carter was
able to depict a sense of hope in the American people. His campaign slogan, “a
leader for a change,” implied that he would help put trust back into American
politics. In his speeches, Carter lived his campaign slogan in such promises as
having a “government that is sensitive to our needs.” In this statement, Carter
not only continued depicting hope, but also showed personal attachment tot the
American people by suggesting that their struggle for a personalized government
is his struggle too. Furthermore, he used words such as “compassionate” and
“love” in the context of the government’s relation to the people, further
showing his promise of personal attachment. Carter also spoke in vague terms in
his campaign, a suggestion that Cicero
outlines as important to avoid making “specific pledges either to the Senate or
the people.” Although Carter did not show how he would make a more truthful
government, he said that it would be “compassionate” and “filled with love.”
Such words, Cicero
described, “assure the common people that you have always been on their side.”
As a result of Carter’s honesty toward the people and his promise to be on
their side, he led the polls by 34 points after both the Democratic and Republican
national conventions. In contrast, while Gerald Ford’s campaign stressed the
incumbent’s honesty, Ford’s pardon of Nixon’s actions in the Watergate scandal
did not portray and honest candidate who would be on the peoples’ side. The
margin by which Carter led after the conventions showed that his honesty toward
the people was an effective strategy.
In addition to Carter proving Cicero ’s campaign tips, Carter’s campaign
used the technique of grassroots campaigning to portray its message to the
American people. A group of volunteers form Carter’s home state of Georgia , called
the “Peanut Brigade,” traveled across the country to campaign for Carter. At
the beginning of the campaign, many Americans asked the question “Jimmy who?”
because Jimmy Carter was relatively unknown on the national level. The “Peanut
Brigade” helped Carter campaign across the United States , adding to the
already large number of trips he made independently.
Jimmy Carter’s
promise for change, his promise to provide a government that listens to the
needs of the American people and provides transparency, and his grassroots
campaign group that brought awareness to his candidacy helped to create an
effective campaign, resulting in Carter’s election. His promises to the people
were especially effective at a time in which the national government was struck
by scandal. Carter was further helped by the fact that his opponent, Gerald
Ford, had low approval ratings as a result of his pardoning of Nixon’s actions
during the Watergate scandal. Although this was the case, the overall
effectiveness of Carter’s promises caused him to win the election by 37
Electoral College votes.
A Jimmy Carter television advertisement called “Washington ” from 1976:
A member of the “Peanut Brigade” Grassroots
campaign
Bibliography
Agiesta, Jennifer. “Approval
Highs and Lows.” The Washington
Post. Last modified July 24, 2007. Accessed October 10, 2012.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/behind-the-numbers/2007/07/approval_highs_and_lows.html.
Broder, David S.
“Carter:Putting Love Back Into the Political Lexicon.” The Washington
Post (Washington District of Columbia ), January 18, 1976.
Carter, Jimmy. “Our Nation’s
Past and Future.” Speech presented at The Democratic National Convention, New York City , NY .
The American Presidency Project. Accessed October 10, 2012.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25953.
“Ford Pardons Nixon -
September 8, 1974.” Youtube. Video file. Accessed October 10, 2012.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM9dGr8ArR0.
Jimmy Carter Presidential
Library. “The Peanut Brigade and the 1976 Election Campaign.” Jimmy Carter
Presidential Library. Accessed October 10, 2012.
http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/education/pt/Unit4.pdf.
Public Broadcasting Station.
“The Election of 1976.” American Experience. Accessed October 10, 2012.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/carter-election1976/.
Stallings, Melissa. “Election
of 1976.” In ABC-Cllio. Accessed October 10, 2012. http://americangovernment.abc-clio.com/Search/Display/200996?terms=election+of+1976.
“’Washington ’ Jimmy Carter 4President 1976 TV
Ad.” Youtube. Video file. Accessed October 10, 2012.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ujaix6ya54.
Interesting point about the Peanut Brigade. Was there any connection between them and Carter? Did they coordinate at all, or were they acting independently? It would make sense to me, if Carter informed them where to go and what he needed, but this may have diminished the energy of a grassroots campaign.
ReplyDeleteGood connections to Cicero's campaign tips. It is interesting that Carter used so many of the ideas Cicero wrote about two thousand years before. Do you think that Carter was aware that by being vague, making lots of promises, and capitalizing on his weak opponent, he was following Cicero's advice?
ReplyDeleteNice job, Andrew. I'm glad you mentioned the Peanut Brigade because Abraham Lincoln's campaign also had a grassroots campaign called the "Wide Awakes." However, the Wide Awakes' goal was to energize the base of the Republican Party, young voters, and voters who were disgusted with the growing tension between the north and south. Their goal was not to get Lincoln's name known, like the goal of the Peanut Brigade.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me that Jimmy Carter's strategy of vague talking points and claiming to be a Washington outsider foreshadow the normal campaigns today that ignore policy specifics and rather speak to ideals and grand notions of what the government should be. Do you think that Jimmy Carter's campaign was a very modern one in terms of message and image?
ReplyDeleteSam, I think you raise an important question about the strategies of campaigns both today and during the time of Jimmy Carter. It seems as though in modern times candidates are using vague generalities more than ever to portray a favorable image of themselves. For example, Barack Obama's promise for "change" was a slogan that suggested that he would reform George Bush's failed economic policies. Also, in the Massachusetts senate race, Scott Brown's slogan is also general stating that "he's for us." Given that many of his commercials are concerned about economic issues, Brown's creation of this slogan was probably in response to America's economic turmoil. Just like Jimmy Carter's campaign, the campaigns of Obama and Brown use(d) vague generalities in desperate times. Carter used vague generalities to respond to Watergate, while Obama and Brown use(d) vague generalities to respond to the failing economy. As a result, I think that many candidates use vague generalities nowadays to respond to the desperate times facing the nation; however, I don't know if one can contribute the use of vague generalities to just the modern times because throughout the course of history, many campaigns have used vague generalities in these times.
Delete